Egypt’s Coordinated Islamization Program—and What It Means for Coptic Christians

By Raymond Ibrahim – Coptic Solidarity –

On October 20, three official reports emerged from Egypt’s state and religious-media apparatus, detailing a coordinated architecture of religious-state policy (a fourth report had appeared a week earlier). Taken together, these announcements—driven by President Abdel Fattah el- Sisi, his Minister of Awqaf (Endowments), Sheikh Al-Azhar, and the Mufti of the Republic—reveal a systematic effort to expand Sunni-Muslim influence across education, culture, youth programs, and state asset management. Cloaked in the language of “moderation” and “national cohesion,” the real agenda is more dramatic: the religionization of the Egyptian state—a deepening Islamization with profound consequences for Egypt’s minorities, first and foremost, its most indigenous community: the Coptic Christians.

A Coordinated State–Religious Apparatus

The four recent initiatives are as follows:

1. Sisi and Awqaf: Expansion of imam and preacher training, nationwide children’s programming in 20,000-plus mosques under the banner “Correct Your Concepts,” and directives to maximize financial benefit from Awqaf endowments.
2. Culture Ministry and Dar al-Ifta: Joint publications, training programs, and cultural outreach aimed at “building the Egyptian human” via state-approved “moderate thought.”
3. Dar al-Ifta and the Grand Egyptian Museum (GEM): Civilizational heritage is being married to religious messaging, further embedding Islam into the narrative of national history and tourism.
4. Al-Azhar and Cairo University: Curricula and research now explicitly draw on Islamic heritage to “respond to contemporary challenges.”

Such developments are not new or unique: Several reports in the past few months alone—concerning the Minister of Awqaf meeting the Minister of Education, or the head of the Space Agency, or the Mufti meeting the Foreign Minister, or reports on pushing Kuttab (Quranic madrassah, not unlike those of Pakistan, or Afghanistan—all are part of a growing and persistent pattern.

Nor are they isolated policy tweaks; they form a deliberate, multi-institutional strategy to weave Sunni Islam into the fabric of Egyptian life—schools, mosques, universities, museums, youth programs, and cultural centers. The implications are clear: a regime bolstered in religious legitimacy, and a narrowing of civic space for non-Muslim voices.

The power dynamics are unmistakable. Sisi commands the overarching program; the Ministry of Awqaf supplies infrastructure and finances; Al-Azhar and Dar al-Ifta provide religious legitimacy, training, and doctrinal authority. Children’s programs in over 20,000 mosques reveal how early this indoctrination begins. The push to extract maximum value from Awqaf assets shows the financial levers being mobilized to fuel the religionization project.

The rhetorical frame—“moderation,” “national identity,” “combatting extremism”—functions as a legitimating veil. Beneath it lies a more sinister reality: the state is embedding a particular religious worldview—a distinctly Islamic one, aligned with government priorities—into the everyday life of Egyptians. Religious institutions are now openly no longer independent moral actors—they are conduits of state ideology.

Copts: From Indigenous Citizens to Alienated Spectators

For Egypt’s Coptic Christians, who make up 10–15% of the population, the consequences are dire. High-profile state visits and symbolic gestures cannot counterbalance a policy that systematically sidelines them:

• Institutional Marginalization: As Sunni-Muslim institutions dominate identity formation, Coptic institutions have no equivalent role. Museums, curricula, and mosque programs are Sunni-controlled; Christians are relegated to passive observers, not participating architects.
• Civic and Legal Risk: Copts continue to face unequal treatment under personal-status laws, church construction restrictions, and sectarian violence. U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom reports note courts applying Sharia inheritance rules to Christians in violation of their faith.
• Narrative Control: Linking “national identity” to state-sanctioned Islamic heritage implicitly erases millennia of pre-Islamic/Pharaonic, and six centuries of Coptic Christian, history from Egypt. The Copts’ role in Egypt’s national story is actively canceled.
• Content Exclusion: Museum programs and curricula framed around Sunni-Islamic narratives systematically erase minority histories, weakening both visibility and identity.
• Symbolism vs. Substance: While church-building initiatives and state visits are touted, real influence over socialization sites—mosques, universities, cultural programs—is firmly in Sunni-Muslim hands.

Nor does the term “moderate thought” offer any reassurance. It signals only state-approved Islam. Voices outside this official line—Christian minorities, independent Muslims, critical religious actors—are delegitimized by tying authenticity to government certification, training, and funding. The joint cultural programs merely mask the creation of a citizenry whose moral compass is centrally managed and Muslim oriented.

Meanwhile, the state reaps enormous benefits:

• Consolidating Sisi’s legitimacy by presenting him as guardian of both state and religion—a modern sultan, if not a caliph.
• Embedding state-approved religious norms into social infrastructure, ensuring generational compliance.
• Leveraging Awqaf’s financial and symbolic network to extend government influence deeper into society.

A New Religious State Order

What to watch for:

• Content of children’s mosque programs: presentation of minorities, civic values, and the shaping of historical memory.
• Composition of imam and daʿwah training: curriculum control and enforcement of ideological orthodoxy.
• Allocation of Awqaf revenues: exclusive Sunni-Muslim programs or genuine interfaith initiatives.
• Representation of Coptic heritage in museums, curricula, and cultural forums.
• Implementation of legal reforms promised to minorities versus expansion of religion-state infrastructure.

What these announcements reveal is more than a “reform” agenda—moderate or otherwise; they signal the emergence of a new civic-religious order in Egypt. Sunni-Muslim institutions are being harnessed to mold national identity, manage youth, and consolidate power.

Within this architecture, Copts, already institutionally marginalized, are set to see their long-standing vulnerability deepen.

_____________

Top photo: the president of Cairo University kissing the imma of Sheikh Al-Azhar.