By Magdi Khalil – President, Middle East Freedom Forum
Women were also victims of Berhamy’s hate speech, as the extremely prejudiced spiritual leader, who obviously perceives women to be evil and subhuman, made a claim that “women, donkeys and black dogs invalidate prayers”. When asked why black dogs in specific, he confidently replied that the black one is inhabited by the devil!
The spiritual leader’s fatwas and advice are simply horrific: sexual intercourse with young girls, even as young as 3 years old should be allowed. Muslim men are forbidden from loving their Christian or Jewish wives, but they can enjoy their bodies as much as they want, and this is the only reason they should take them as wives.
Taking all of the above into account, it is only reasonable to question Harvard’s decision to admit Bakkar into its MPA program. Were the terms of admission overlooked or the rules bent as a result of political pressure? If that is the case, then the University’s independence has been compromised. Did Saudi donations and funds raised by extremist Islamic countries play a role in that decision? If that is true, then rules were sacrificed for the sake of money and corruption has found its way into the University. Is Harvard aware of the extremely prejudiced attitudes of Bakkar and the party he speaks for? If so, then the University is culpable of promoting discrimination.
Harvard University has to make a quick decision regarding the presence of Mr. Bakkar among its students; otherwise, it may be held accountable and legally challenged by human rights agencies and victims of Bakkar’s discrimination.
Meanwhile, all who are concerned with this issue will be waiting for Harvard’s response to the questions raised above.
Magdi Khalil is a president of Middle East Freedom Forum
